NEW YORK (Reuters) – A U.S. judge on Thursday said institutional investors, including BlackRock Inc (BLK.N) and Allianz SE’s (ALVG.DE) Pacific Investment Management Co, can pursue much of their lawsuit accusing 15 major banks of rigging prices in the $6.6 trillion-a-day foreign exchange market.
FILE PHOTO: The Citigroup Inc (Citi) logo is seen at the SIBOS banking and financial conference in Toronto, Ontario, Canada October 19, 2017. Picture taken October 19, 2017. REUTERS/Chris Helgren/File Photo
U.S. District Judge Lorna Schofield in Manhattan said the nearly 1,300 plaintiffs, including many mutual funds and exchange-traded funds, plausibly alleged that the banks conspired to rig currency benchmarks from 2003 to 2013 and profit at their expense.
“This is an injury of the type the antitrust laws were intended to prevent,” Schofield wrote in a 40-page decision.
The banks, which sometimes controlled more than 90% of the market, included Bank of America, Barclays, BNP Paribas, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, Royal Bank of Canada, Royal Bank of Scotland, Societe Generale, Standard Chartered and UBS or various affiliates.
In their complaint, the plaintiffs accused the banks of improperly sharing confidential orders and trading positions, and using chat rooms with such names as “The Cartel,” “The Mafia” and “The Bandits’ Club.”
Banks were also accused of using deceptive trading tactics such as “front running,” “banging the close” and “taking out the filth.”
The banks countered that the plaintiffs pointed to no transactions where the alleged manipulation caused losses.
Schofield dismissed portions of some the claims, and dismissed some Allianz plaintiffs from the case.
Lawyers for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The litigation began in November 2018, after the plaintiffs “opted out” of similar nationwide litigation that had resulted in $2.31 billion of settlements with most of the banks.
Those settlements followed regulatory probes worldwide that led to more than $10 billion of fines for several banks, and the convictions or indictments of some traders.
Investors typically opt out of litigation when they hope to recover more by suing on their own.
The case is Allianz Global Investors GMBH et al v Bank of America Corp et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 18-10364.
Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Aurora Ellis